Transhumanism - Revision history

WillSysAd: 6 revisions imported: Import from TALOD sans templates

2026-07-19T11:15:33Z

6 revisions imported: Import from TALOD sans templates

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:15, 19 July 2026
(No difference)

talod>MyNameJuls at 07:00, 14 May 2026

2026-05-14T07:00:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 14 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Basis}}

	'''Transhumanism''' is a political and philosophical movement that advocates the [[wikipedia:human enhancement\|enhancement of the human condition]] by developing and making widely available new and future technologies to enhance longevity, cognition, and well-being. It rose in prominence in early-24th-century [[Visala]]. Transhumanism is characterized by support for [[wikipedia:eugenics\|eugenics]], [[wikipedia:natalism\|natalism]], [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]] and [[wikipedia:Technological utopianism\|technological utopianism]]. Opposed to [[wikipedia:Bioconservatism\|bioconservatism]], [[wikipedia:neo-Luddism\|neo-Luddism]] and [[wikipedia:liberalism\|liberalism]], transhumanism is generally considered on the far-right of the traditional left–right spectrum, although that positioning is debated by scholars.		'''Transhumanism''' is a political and philosophical movement that advocates the [[wikipedia:human enhancement\|enhancement of the human condition]] by developing and making widely available new and future technologies to enhance longevity, cognition, and well-being. It rose in prominence in early-24th-century [[Visala]]. Transhumanism is characterized by support for [[wikipedia:eugenics\|eugenics]], [[wikipedia:natalism\|natalism]], [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]] and [[wikipedia:Technological utopianism\|technological utopianism]]. Opposed to [[wikipedia:Bioconservatism\|bioconservatism]], [[wikipedia:neo-Luddism\|neo-Luddism]] and [[wikipedia:liberalism\|liberalism]], transhumanism is generally considered on the far-right of the traditional left–right spectrum, although that positioning is debated by scholars.

talod>MyNameJuls: /* Comparison with fascism */

2026-03-18T17:42:01Z

Comparison with fascism

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 18 March 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:
	This view is disputed by the [[Haynadur]]ian scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."		This view is disputed by the [[Haynadur]]ian scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."

	Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."		Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, often overlooking ethics, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."

	==Criticism==		==Criticism==

talod>MyNameJuls: /* Comparison with fascism */

2026-03-18T17:39:30Z

Comparison with fascism

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 18 March 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Transhumanism shares certain similarities with [[fascism (Basis)\|fascism]] according to most scholars. Both ideologies emphasize [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]], a form of modernism that condemns liberal or conservative values of tradition while promoting a technological-martial doctrine of national renewal that emphasizes militant nationalism. According to the [[Qym]]ish historian [[Valir Peshav]], transhumanism and fascism share the "desire to recreate humanity," and are "essentially variants of one another".		Transhumanism shares certain similarities with [[fascism (Basis)\|fascism]] according to most scholars. Both ideologies emphasize [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]], a form of modernism that condemns liberal or conservative values of tradition while promoting a technological-martial doctrine of national renewal that emphasizes militant nationalism. According to the [[Qym]]ish historian [[Valir Peshav]], transhumanism and fascism share the "desire to recreate humanity," and are "essentially variants of one another".

	This view is disputed by the [[~~Haynaduria~~]]n scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."		This view is disputed by the [[Haynadur]]ian scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."

	Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."		Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."

talod>MyNameJuls: /* Comparison with fascism */

2026-03-18T17:39:06Z

Comparison with fascism

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 18 March 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:

	==Comparison with fascism==		==Comparison with fascism==
	Transhumanism shares certain similarities with [[fascism (Basis)\|fascism]] according to most scholars. Both ideologies emphasize [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]], a form of modernism that ~~condemned~~ liberal or conservative values of tradition while promoting a technological-martial doctrine of national renewal that ~~emphasized~~ militant nationalism. According to the [[Qym]]ish historian [[Valir Peshav]], transhumanism and fascism share the "desire to recreate humanity," and are "essentially variants of one another".		Transhumanism shares certain similarities with [[fascism (Basis)\|fascism]] according to most scholars. Both ideologies emphasize [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]], a form of modernism that condemns liberal or conservative values of tradition while promoting a technological-martial doctrine of national renewal that emphasizes militant nationalism. According to the [[Qym]]ish historian [[Valir Peshav]], transhumanism and fascism share the "desire to recreate humanity," and are "essentially variants of one another".

	This view is disputed by the [[Haynaduria]]n scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."		This view is disputed by the [[Haynaduria]]n scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."

	Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."		Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."

	==Criticism==		==Criticism==

talod>MyNameJuls at 17:38, 18 March 2026

2026-03-18T17:38:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 18 March 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:
	===Reactionary modernism===		===Reactionary modernism===
	===Technological utopianism===		===Technological utopianism===

			==Comparison with fascism==
			Transhumanism shares certain similarities with [[fascism (Basis)\|fascism]] according to most scholars. Both ideologies emphasize [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]], a form of modernism that condemned liberal or conservative values of tradition while promoting a technological-martial doctrine of national renewal that emphasized militant nationalism. According to the [[Qym]]ish historian [[Valir Peshav]], transhumanism and fascism share the "desire to recreate humanity," and are "essentially variants of one another".

			This view is disputed by the [[Haynaduria]]n scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."

			Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."

	==Criticism==		==Criticism==
	===Ethical issues===		===Ethical issues===

talod>MyNameJuls: Created page with "'''Transhumanism''' is a political and philosophical movement that advocates the enhancement of the human condition by developing and making widely available new and future technologies to enhance longevity, cognition, and well-being. It rose in prominence in early-24th-century Visala. Transhumanism is characterized by support for eugenics, natalism, wikipedia:reactionary modernism|reacti..."

2026-03-18T07:05:54Z

Created page with "'''Transhumanism''' is a political and philosophical movement that advocates the enhancement of the human condition by developing and making widely available new and future technologies to enhance longevity, cognition, and well-being. It rose in prominence in early-24th-century Visala. Transhumanism is characterized by support for eugenics, natalism, wikipedia:reactionary modernism|reacti..."

New page

'''Transhumanism''' is a political and philosophical movement that advocates the [[wikipedia:human enhancement|enhancement of the human condition]] by developing and making widely available new and future technologies to enhance longevity, cognition, and well-being. It rose in prominence in early-24th-century [[Visala]]. Transhumanism is characterized by support for [[wikipedia:eugenics|eugenics]], [[wikipedia:natalism|natalism]], [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism|reactionary modernism]] and [[wikipedia:Technological utopianism|technological utopianism]]. Opposed to [[wikipedia:Bioconservatism|bioconservatism]], [[wikipedia:neo-Luddism|neo-Luddism]] and [[wikipedia:liberalism|liberalism]], transhumanism is generally considered on the far-right of the traditional left–right spectrum, although that positioning is debated by scholars.

==History==
===Background===
===Impact of the Genonian Revolution===
===Transhumanist Geno===
===International reach===

==Tenets==
===Eugenics===
===Natalism===
===Reactionary modernism===
===Technological utopianism===
==Criticism==
===Ethical issues===
===Traditional humanism===

[[Category:Transhumanism]][[Category:MyNameJuls]][[Category:Basis]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 18 March 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Transhumanism shares certain similarities with [[fascism (Basis)\|fascism]] according to most scholars. Both ideologies emphasize [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]], a form of modernism that condemns liberal or conservative values of tradition while promoting a technological-martial doctrine of national renewal that emphasizes militant nationalism. According to the [[Qym]]ish historian [[Valir Peshav]], transhumanism and fascism share the "desire to recreate humanity," and are "essentially variants of one another".		Transhumanism shares certain similarities with [[fascism (Basis)\|fascism]] according to most scholars. Both ideologies emphasize [[wikipedia:reactionary modernism\|reactionary modernism]], a form of modernism that condemns liberal or conservative values of tradition while promoting a technological-martial doctrine of national renewal that emphasizes militant nationalism. According to the [[Qym]]ish historian [[Valir Peshav]], transhumanism and fascism share the "desire to recreate humanity," and are "essentially variants of one another".

	This view is disputed by the [[~~Haynaduria~~]]n scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."		This view is disputed by the [[Haynadur]]ian scholar [[Bandhitakara Ghatanat]], who claims the two ideologies differ in their core beliefs regarding humanity. She argues transhumanism rejects [[wikipedia:scientific racism\|scientific racism]] and does not inherently discriminate based on racial and national characteristics of human groups, but rather does so on ideal traits and capabilities of a single [[wikipedia:human\|human race]]. She states, "transhumanists believe there are three stages of human advancement, the natural state of '[[wikipedia:human\|human]]', the engineered '[[wikipedia:transhuman\|transhuman]]' and the desired ideal of '[[wikipedia:Posthuman#Transhumanism\|posthuman]]', while fascists believe their [[wikipedia:master race\|master race]] or nation is already superior and the peak of humanity."

	Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."		Ghatanat views the national feeling of [[Geno]]nian superiority as merely "the natural realization of a more technologically advanced society towards those they perceive as embracing primitivism by their refusal to apply transhumanism themselves." She compares their sentiment to that of "an educated city-dweller in a modern society looking on at home-schooling and anti-vaccine parents," arguing the sentiment felt is pity and incomprehension, not hatred. In contrast, Ghatanat views fascism as a manifestation of a [[wikipedia:superiority complex\|superiority complex]] and is "essentially a political defense mechanism to cope for their own personal failures and inadequacies." She summarizes the differences between transhumanism and fascism by stating: "transhumanists strive to become superior humans by acknowledging and fixing their perceived inadequacies, while fascists delude themselves into believing they are already superior humans while blaming their perceived inadequacies on others."